← Cases

Coughlin v. Park Row Realty Co.

236 N.Y. 625 Court N.Y. Decision date 1923-07-13 English

Judges Concur: His cook, Ch. J., Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ.

Contents

Majority

p. 625
Louis Coughlin, Respondent, v. Park Row Realty Company, Inc., Appellant.

Headnote

Negligence — elevators — collapse of platform of elevator.
Coughlin v. Park Row Realty Co., Inc., 206 App. Div. 610 , affirmed,
(Argued June 13, 1923;
decided July 13, 1923.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered March 19, 1923, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff through the negligence of defendant. Plaintiff was severely injured between nine and nine-thirty a. m. on November 12, 1921, by being precipitated thirty-three
p. 626
feet down an elevator pit while delivering merchandise on a sidewalk elevator appurtenant to defendant’s premises Nos. 13-21 Park, Row, borough of Manhattan, New York, and used in connection therewith. The elevator ran from the sidewalk level in front of the building to the basement and sub-basement and was at the time at the sidewalk level. After the plaintiff and another employee opened the gates, which covered the shaft, they placed the barrel of glucose in an upright position upon the elevator by rolling it along the outer side of the elevator shaft so that one end projected a few inches over the elevator platform, which was six inches below the level of the walk; and then, lifting the other end up gradually; thereafter they stepped on to the platform of the elevator for the purpose of shifting the barrel toward the center of the platform, and when they put the barrel on or got on and were’ endeavoring to move it or had moved it a little, the platform tilted or sagged or inclined downward at the north end and immediately thereafter dropped north end first, carrying plaintiff, who was at the north end, with it to the bottom of the shaft.
E. C. Sherwood and Charles Stewart Davison for appellant.
Frank C. Laughlin and L. H. Schleider for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: His cook, Ch. J., Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ.