← Cases

Gaines v. Huyler

239 N.Y. 611 Court N.Y. Decision date 1925-01-21 English

Contents

Majority

p. 611
Martha A. Gaines, Individually and as Executrix of Abigail A. Huyler, Deceased, Appellant, v. Frank De K. Huyler et al., Individually and as Executors and Trustees under the Will of John S. Huyler, Deceased, et al., Respondents.

Headnote

Limitation of actions — action to recover certificate of stock and for . accounting as to dividends — when barred by Statute of Limitations.
Gaines v. Huyler, 206 App. Div. 777 , affirmed.
(Argued December 17, 1924;
decided January 21, 1925.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered September 12, 1923, affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a dismissal of the
p. 612
complaint by the court on trial at Special Term. The action was to recover fifty shares of the capital stock of the corporation known as “ Huyler’s,” which were issued to David Huyler, now deceased, on the 7th day of June, 1881. The plaintiff, daughter of David Huyler, alleged in her complaint that this stock was the property of her father at the time of his death, July 19, 1885, more than thirty-two years prior to the commencement of this action; that under the terms of his will, of which her brother, John S. Huyler, was the executor and trustee, her mother had a fife estate in the property; that on her mother’s death the property descended to her; that her brother, John S. Huyler, who was the trustee of his father’s "will, failed to account for the stock in his lifetime, and that the defendants, who were his sons and the trustees under his will, are in possession of said certificate. The relief which she asks is that it be decreed that John S. Huyler’s legal representatives be compelled to surrender the certificate to her and that they be required to account to her for the dividends thereon. The defendants contended that David Huyler was not the owner of the certificate in question at the time of his death; that prior to his death he transferred it to his son, John S. Huyler, their father, and that under the terms of the will of John S. Huyler the title to the property vested in them. The defendants also pleaded the Statute of Limitations. The trial justice and Appellate Division held that the action was barred by the Statute of Limitations.
John J. Crawford for appellant.
Nathan L. Miller and Kenneth McEwen for Frank De K. Huyler et al., respondents.
Edmund L. Mooney, John D. Beale and Douglas Nicholson for respondent David Huyler.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Hiscock, Ch. J., Cardozo, Pound, Crane, Andrews and Lehman, JJ. Absent: McLaughlin, J.