Majority
The question arises whether an appeal may be taken to this court as of right from a final judgment: “ Where one or more of the Justices of the Appellate Division * * * having sat in the case, refrains from participating in the decision of the court.” (Civ. Prac. Act, § 588, subd. 1.)
The failure of a sitting justice to participate in the decision of the court is not a dissent.
While the Legislature may further restrict the jurisdiction of the Court of Appeals and the right of appeal thereto (Const, art. VI, § 7, subd. 5) it may not enlarge such right of appeal.
When the Constitution was amended the clause above quoted became unconstitutional and should have been eliminated from the Civil Practice Act. Prior to the adoption of the amended article, the Constitution did not limit the right of appeal from final judgments but such right was subject to legislative restriction. With the right of appeal now limited by the Constitution, the power of the Legislature is limited to further restrictions.
Four justices of the Appellate Division shall constitute a quorum (Const, art. VI, § 2) and the unanimous affirmance by a court of four judges requires leave to appeal under Constitution (Art. VI, § 7, subd. 1, supra).
On the merits, the motion for leave to appeal is denied, - with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements.