Hyperlawhypertext legal database Lust v. Hanover National Bank 260 N.Y. 683

← Cases

Lust v. Hanover National Bank

260 N.Y. 683 Court N.Y. Decision date 1932-12-16 English

Contents

Majority

p. 683
Fritz S. Lust, Appellant, v. Hanover National Bank, Respondent. (Actions Nos. 1 and 2.) Frederick S. Lust, Appellant, v. Hanover National Bank of New York, Respondent. (Action No. 3.)
(Argued November 30, 1932;
decided December 16, 1932.)
p. 684
Louis Boehm, David Baseh and Martin C. Ansorge for appellant.
Theodore J. Miller for respondent.

Judgments affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Pound, Ch. J., Crane, Lehman, Kellogg, O’Brien, Hubbs and Crouch, JJ.