Tillman v. Russo-Asiatic Bank — 264 N.Y. 467

Majority

p. 467

James A. Tillman, Appellant, v. Russo-Asiatic Bank, Respondent.

(Argued February 27, 1934;

decided March 13, 1934.)

p. 468

Borris M. Komar for appellant.

Maurice Léon and André Maximov for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs. The effect of the ex parte order at Special Term was merely to create a notation on the record of valid action taken by the Federal court. First question certified in the affirmative. Second question certified not answered. No opinion. (See 264 N. Y. 670 .)

Concur: Pound, Ch. J., Crane, Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs and Crouch, JJ. Not sitting: Kellogg, J.