Hyperlawhypertext legal database Goldberg-Rudkowsky v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States 266 N.Y. 451

← Cases

Goldberg-Rudkowsky v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States

266 N.Y. 451 Court N.Y. Decision date 1934-12-31 English

Contents

Majority

p. 451
Nisel A. Goldberg-Rudkowsky, Appellant and Respondent, v. The Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States, Respondent and Appellant.
(Argued November 22, 1934;
decided December 31, 1934.)
Botris M. Komar for plaintiff, appellant and respondent.
John W. Davis, William C. Cannon and David E. Hudson for defendant, respondent and appellant.

The judgment appealed from by the defendant should be reversed, and the complaint dismissed, with costs in all courts, on the authority of Dougherty v. Equitable Life Assur. Society, decided herewith ( 266 N. Y. 71 ). The judgment appealed from by the plaintiff should be affirmed, with costs, upon the authority of that case, without discussing the question of sealed instruments, it being unnecessary. (See 266 N. Y. 615 .)

Pound, Ch. J., Crane, Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch and Loughran, JJ., concur.

Judgment accordingly.

Cases cited