Majority
We agree with the Appellate Division that, “ Under the evidence, irrespective of the origin of the fire, it was a question of fact whether the defendant had used reasonable care to safeguard his guests.” ( 242 App. Div. 892 , 893.) There was, however, no evidence of negligence in respect of the origin of the fire. The refusal so to charge the jury was error for which a new trial should be had.
In each case the judgment of the Appellate Division and that of the Trial Term should be reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event.
Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Crouch and Loughran, JJ., concur; Hubbs and Finch, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse and dismiss the complaint.
Judgments reversed, etc.