City of New York v. Van Schaick — 267 N.Y. 517

Majority

p. 517

The City of New York et al., Respondents, v. George S. Van Schaick, Superintendent of Insurance of the State of New York, as Liquidator of the Concord Casualty and Surety Company, Appellant.

(Argued March 12, 1935;

decided April 16, 1935.)

p. 519

Walter B. Herendeen, Seymour Joseph and Albert D. Levin for appellant.

Paul Windels, Corporation Counsel (John F. Collins, Russell Lord Tarbox and Harry Merwin of counsel), for The City of New York, respondent.

John F. Collins, Russell Lord Tarbox and Harry Merwin for James F. Egan, individually and as Public Administrator, etc., respondent.

Judgments modified by reducing the amount of the recovery to $50,009.22, with interest thereon from March 4, 1933, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. No opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch, Loughran and Finch, JJ.