Seeck & Kade, Inc. v. Tomshinsky — 269 N.Y. 613

Majority

p. 613

Seeck & Kade, Inc., Appellant, v. R. Tomshinsky, Individually and Trading as Webster Cut Rate Drug Stores, et al., Respondents.

(Argued December 2, 1935;

decided January 7, 1936.)

p. 614

Mark Eisner and James F. Donnelly for appellant.

Jay Leo Rothschild and .Froncés Kneitel for respondents.

Jay Leo Rothschild for Heam Department Stores, Inc., amicus curios.

Charles Goldman and Harold Dublirer for Cooper & Cooper, Inc,, amicus curice.

Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the authority of Doubleday, Doran & Co. v. Macy & Co. ( 269 N. Y. 272 ). No opinion.

Concur; Crañe, Ch, J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch, Loughran and Finch, JJ.