New York Lumber Trade Ass'n v. Lacey — 269 N.Y. 677

Majority

p. 677

The New York Lumber Trade Association et al., Appellants, v. Martin Lacey, Individually and as President of the Transportation Trades Council of the Port of New York and Vicinity, et al., Respondents, Impleaded with Others.

(Submitted January 6, 1936;

decided January 14, 1936.)

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and when returned it will be amended by adding thereto, after the words “ and the same hereby is affirmed with costs,” the following: “ this court having held that if there is any illegality in defendants’ action it arises from encroachment upon rights regulated by the Shipping Act; and that while this court has jurisdiction of the Labor Unions, yet the courts of this State should not grant an injunction until the Shipping Board has by its order defined the plaintiffs’ rights.” (See 269 N. Y. 595 .)

Cases cited

New York Lumber Trade Assn v. Lacey 269 N. Y. 595 N.Y. 1935-12-10 p. 677