Hoff v. Hoff — 276 N.Y. 569

Majority

p. 569

In the Matter of Bertha Hoff, Appellant, v. William A. Hoff, Respondent.

Argued November 16, 1937;

decided November 30, 1937.

p. 570

Paul Windels, Corporation Counsel (Paxton Blair and Alice E. Trubin of counsel), for appellant.

Noah Seedman for respondent.

Order affirmed, without costs. This affirmance is without prejudice to a renewal of the application in the Domestic Relations Court if the mother be so advised. No opinion.

Concur: Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ.; Crane, Ch. J., dissents and votes to sustain the order of allowance of fifteen dollars a week to the children on the ground the court had jurisdiction of that proceeding.