Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Claim of Dienske v. Tompkins 280 N.Y. 524

← Cases

Claim of Dienske v. Tompkins

280 N.Y. 524 Court N.Y. Decision date 1939-02-21 English

Contents

Majority

p. 524
In the Matter of the Claim of Andrew Dienske, Respondent, against F. Bianchi Tompkins et al., Appellants. State Industrial Board, Respondent.
Argued January 11, 1939;
decided February 21, 1939.
p. 525
J. Vanderbilt Straub and Edward L. Johnson for appellants.
John J. Bennett, Jr., Attorney-General (Roy Wiedersum of counsel), for State Industrial Board, respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ.

J. Vanderbilt Straub and Edward L. Johnson for appellants. John

J. Bennett, Jr., Attorney-General (Roy Wiedersum of counsel), for State Industrial Board, respondent. Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion. Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ.