Majority
p. 687Schafran & Finkel, Inc., Appellant, v. M. Lowenstein & Sons, Inc., Respondent. Submitted April 3, 1939; decided April 11, 1939.
Motion for reargument denied with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements. There is no stay preventing defendant from < proceeding according to the provisions of the Arbitration Law. Neither is there any intimation in the opinion that there was, or was not, a contract. We were dealing simply with the pleadings as they were. (See 280 N. Y. 164 .)
Cases cited
- Schafran & Finkel, Inc. v. M. Lowenstein & Sons, Inc. 280 N. Y. 164 p. 687