Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Claim of Kusel v. Eastern Bridle Iron & Steel Corp. 283 N.Y. 671

← Cases

Claim of Kusel v. Eastern Bridle Iron & Steel Corp.

283 N.Y. 671 Court N.Y. Decision date 1940-06-11 English

Contents

Majority

p. 671
In the Matter of the Claim of Morris Kusel, Respondent, against Eastern Bridle Iron & Steel Corporation et al., Appellants. State Industrial Board, Respondent.
Argued May 21, 1940;
decided June 11, 1940.
p. 672
George S. Collins for appellants.
John J. Bennett, Jr., Attorney-General {Roy Wiedersum of counsel), for State Industrial Board, respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Loughran, Pinch, Rippey, Lewis and Conway, JJ. Lehman, Ch. J., and Sears, J., dissent on the ground that there is neither finding nor testimony that the injury was caused by an accident.