Hyperlawhypertext legal database In re Eitingon 296 N.Y. 842

← Cases

In re Eitingon

296 N.Y. 842 Court N.Y. Decision date 1947-02-20 English

Contents

Majority

p. 842
In the Matter of the Petition of Rose Eitingon. In the Matter of the Accounting of Motty Eitingon et al., as Surviving Trustees of a Trust for Rose Eitingon. Motty Eitingon et al., Individually and as Executors and Trustees, Appellants; Rose Eitingon et al., Respondents.
Argued January 7, 1947;
decided February 20, 1947.
p. 843
Monroe Goldwater, George P. Halperin, Daniel Katz and Eugene V. Weissman for Motty Eitingon et ah, individually, appellants.
Arthur Garfield Hays and James B. Cherry for Motty Eitingon et al., as executors of Solomon Schild, deceased, appellants.
Kenneth J. Mullane and William T. Griffin for Rose Eitingon Field, respondent.
Morris J. Bricker and Samuel Levy, special guardians for Joan Goldstein and another, respondent.

An order or decree of a Surrogate’s Court vacating a prior decree in an accounting proceeding, and ordering or contemplating further proceedings on the account, is not a final order in a special proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution. Anything to the contrary in Matter of Tilden ( 98 N. Y. 434 ) is hereby overruled. No opinion.

Concur: Loughran, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Thacher, Dye and Fuld, JJ.

Cases cited