In re Rose — 297 N.Y. 786

Majority

p. 786

In the Matter of Samuel Rose, Appellant. Association of the Bar of the City of New York, Respondent.

Argued January 5, 1948;

decided January 16, 1948.

Sydney A. Hellenbrand and Harold W. Hastings for appellant.

Kenneth M. Spence, Henry F. Waldstein and Einar Ghrystie for respondent.

Appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution. No opinion.

Concur: Loughban, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Thacheb, Dye and Fuld, JJ.