Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Claim of Pinto v. Competent Fur Dressers, Inc. 297 N.Y. 846

← Cases

Claim of Pinto v. Competent Fur Dressers, Inc.

297 N.Y. 846 Court N.Y. Decision date 1948-03-11 English

Contents

Majority

p. 846
In the Matter of the Claim of Mary Pinto, Respondent, against Competent Fur Dressers, Inc., et al., Appellants, and State Insurance Fund, Respondent. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.
Argued January 13, 1948;
decided March 11, 1948.
p. 847
Sidney A. Schwartz and Fdtvard Ash for appellants.
Nathaniel L. Goldstein, Attorney-General (Roy Wiedersum of counsel), for Workmen’s Compensation Board, respondent.
Martin Shulman and Paul V. Potrillo for Mary Pinto, respondent.
Bernard Katzen, General Attorney (George J. Hayes and Victor Fiddler of counsel), for the State Insurance Fund, respondent.

Order affirmed, A/vith costs; no opinion.

Concur: Lotjghkan, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond,, Thacheb, Dye and Fuld, JJ.