Hyperlawhypertext legal database Chudnowsky v. Re-Mo Holding Corp. 298 N.Y. 904

← Cases

Chudnowsky v. Re-Mo Holding Corp.

298 N.Y. 904 Court N.Y. Decision date 1949-03-03 English

Judges Concur: Loughban, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, DesmoNd, Dye and Fuld, JJ.

Contents

Majority

p. 904
Elizabeth Chudnowsky, Appellant, v. Re-Mo Holding Corporation et al., Respondents.
Argued January 5, 1949;
decided March 3, 1949.
p. 906
Murray A. Gordon and Herbert J. Fabricant for appellant.
Louis Gusman and Harold A. Diamond for respondents.

Judgments reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, upon the ground that the evidence presents an issue of fact-as to whether the agreement, by which the plaintiff purchased the apartment building in suit, was induced by fraudulent representations of the defendant. No opinion.

Concur: Loughban, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, DesmoNd, Dye and Fuld, JJ.