Case v. Indian Motocycle Co. — 300 N.Y. 513

Majority

p. 513

Walter Case et al., on Behalf of Themselves and All Other Former Employees of R. B. Rogers Companies, Inc., Similarly Situated, Respondents, v. Indian Motocycle Company, Appellant, et al., Defendants. Walter Case et al., on Behalf of Themselves and All Other Former Employees of R. B. Rogers Companies, Inc., Similarly Situated, Respondents, v. John B. Chertok, Appellant, et al., Defendants. Walter Case et al., on Behalf of Themselves and All Other Former Employees of R. B. Rogers Companies, Inc., Similarly Situated, Respondents, v. Indian Motocycle Company et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

• Argued October 19, 1949;

decided November 17, 1949.

p. 516

Louis Connick, Bichard B. Persinger, Newell G. Alford, Jr., and Louis Schlesinger for appellants.

Victor Brudney and Morris J. Siegel for respondents.

Orders affirmed, with costs. Certified questions 5, 6, 7 and 8 answered in the negative. Certified questions 1, 2, 3 and 4 not answered. No opinion.

Concur: Loughran, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Dye, Fuld and Bbomley, JJ.