Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Hoyt v. Hoyt 301 N.Y. 589

← Cases

Hoyt v. Hoyt

301 N.Y. 589 Court N.Y. Decision date 1950-06-02 English

Contents

Majority

p. 589
Ethel B. Hoyt, Respondent, v. Harold W. Hoyt, Appellant.
Argued May 24, 1950;
decided June 2, 1950.
p. 590
H. Broadman Epstein and Harry N. French for appellant.
Edward E. Hoenig for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Loughran, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Dye, Fuld and Froessel, JJ.

H. Broadman Epstein and Harry N. French for appellant. Edward

E. Hoenig for respondent. Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion. Concur: Loughran, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Dye, Fuld and Froessel, JJ.