Hyperlawhypertext legal database Grossman v. Schindel 302 N.Y. 691

← Cases

Grossman v. Schindel

302 N.Y. 691 Court N.Y. Decision date 1951-03-09 English

Contents

Majority

p. 691
Philip Grossman, Appellant, v. Aaron J. Schindel et al., Copartners Doing Business under the Name of Domestic Mills, Respondents. Aaron J. Schindel et al., Copartners Doing Business under the Name of Domestic Mills, Plaintiffs, v. Philip Grossman, Defendant.
Submitted February 26, 1951;
decided March 9, 1951.
p. 692
Ephraim S. London, William H. Lundin and Seymour M. Burg for motion.
Jerome F. Katz and Eugene L. Bondy opposed.

Motion dismissed, with $10 costs and necessary printing disbursements, upon the ground that the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.