Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Gorman v. City of New York 304 N.Y. 865

← Cases

Gorman v. City of New York

304 N.Y. 865 Court N.Y. Decision date 1952-12-04 English

Contents

Majority

p. 865
Walter A. Gorman et al., Appellants, v. City of New York et al., Respondents.
Argued October 24, 1952;
decided December 4, 1952.
p. 867
James H. Tully, Truman II. Luhrman and Edward J. McGowan for appellants.
Denis M. Hurley, Corporation Counsel (W. Bernard Richland and Pauline K. Berger of counsel), for respondents.
Miles F. McDonald, District Attorney of Kings County {Aaron Nussbaum and Aaron E. Koota of counsel), amicus curios, in support of respondents’ position.
David Du Vivier and William Mason Smith, Jr., for the Association of the Bar of the City of New York, amicus curios, in support of respondents ’ position.
Frank S. Hogan, District Attorney of New York County {Richard G. Denser and Charles W. Manning of counsel), amicus curios, in support of respondents’ position.
Samuel D. Smoleff, Laurence Arnold Tanser and Bernard Hershkopf for The Citizens Union of the City of New York, amicus curios, in support of respondents ’ position.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Loughban, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Dye, Fuld and Fboessel, JJ. [See 304 N. Y. 973 .]

Cases cited