← Cases

People v. Brinkman

309 N.Y. 974 Court N.Y. Decision date 1956-01-13 English

Contents

Majority

p. 974
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Gerard J. Brinkman, Appellant.
Argued November 17, 1955;
decided January 13, 1956.
p. 975
Henry W. Schober for appellant.
T. Vincent Quinn, District Attorney (Benj. J. Jacobson, J. Wolfe Chassen and Frank J. Crisona of counsel), for respondent.

At least twelve of the Grand Jurors, who voted to indict, heard all essential and critical evidence including the testimony of the defendant. Based on such evidence the Grand Jury was privileged to return an indictment, since it was sufficient if unexplained or uncontradicted to warrant a conviction by a trial jury (Code Crim. Pro., § 258). The only testimony not heard by at least twelve of the jurors was of an incriminating

p. 976
nature but was not necessary to the finding of the indictment as it was merely repetitious.

The order should be affirmed.

Conway, Ch. J., Desmond, Fuld, Fboessel, Van Vooehis and Burke, JJ., concur; Dye, J., taking no part.

Order affirmed.