Hyperlawhypertext legal database Micks v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad 49 N.Y. 654

← Cases

Micks v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad

49 N.Y. 654 Court N.Y. Docket No. 2 English

Contents

Majority

p. 654
Jared P. Micks, Respondent, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant. Samuel D. Wilde, Respondent, v. The Same, Appellant. Samuel D. Wilde, Respondent, v. The Same, Appellant. John D. Hoyt Chamberlain, Respondent, v. The Same, Appellant.
(No. 2).
A. P. Laming for the appellant.
George W. Oothrcm for the respondents.

These four cases present the same questions and were decided upon authority of Fisher v. N. Y. C. and H. R. R. R. Co. ( 46 N. Y., 644 ).

Agree to affirm, for one penalty, and excess of fare, and reverse as to residue without costs in this court.

Judgment accordingly.