Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Foote v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad 50 N.Y. 693

← Cases

Foote v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad

50 N.Y. 693 Court N.Y. Decision date 1872-12-24 English

Contents

Majority

p. 693
Nelson W. Foote, Respondent, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant. Mary A. Norris, Respondent, v. Same, Appellant. Thomas Bulger, Respondent, v. Same, Appellant. Daniel G. Eastman, Respondent, v. Same, Appellant. James Lester, Respondent, v. Same, Appellant. Murdy B. Smith, Respondent, v. Same, Appellant.
(Argued December 17, 1872;
decided December 24, 1872.)
A. P. Lanvng for the appellant.
George W. Cothran for the respondents.

Judgment reduced to one penalty, and excess of fare paid without costs to either party. No opinion.

These cases presented the same question as in Fisher v. N. Y. C. and H. R. R. R. Co. ( 46 N. Y., 644 ).