Hyperlawhypertext legal database Prinz v. Fey 12 N.Y.2d 986

← Cases

Prinz v. Fey

12 N.Y.2d 986 Court N.Y. Decision date 1963-02-21 English

Contents

Majority

p. 986
In the Matter of the Claim of Elmo Prinz, Respondent, v. Harold Fey, Jr., Doing Business as Harold Fey, Jr., Landscaping Service, et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.
Argued January 21, 1963;
decided February 21, 1963.
p. 987
John H. Roberts and William P. Hastorf for appellants.
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (Harry Rackow, Paxton Rlair and Roy Wiedersum of counsel), for Workmen’s Compensation Board, respondent.
No appearance for claimant-respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Van Voorhis, Burke, Foster and Scileppi.