Hyperlawhypertext legal database Claim of Uletas v. Elliott 16 N.Y.2d 642

← Cases

Claim of Uletas v. Elliott

16 N.Y.2d 642 Court N.Y. Decision date 1965-05-27 English

Contents

Majority

p. 642
In the Matter of the Claim of Peter Uletas, Respondent, v. William Elliott et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.
Argued May 18, 1965;
decided May 27, 1965.
p. 643
Allen J. Redlich and Powell Cooper for appellants.
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (Jorge L. Gomez, Paxton Blair and Daniel Polansky of counsel), for Workmen’s Compensation Board, respondent.
No appearance for claimant-respondent.
p. 644
Order affirmed, with costs to respondent Workmen’s Compensation Board; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Burke and Scileppi. Judge Van Voorhis dissents and votes to reverse and to dismiss the claim on the dissenting memorandum of Justice Herlihy in the first appeal to the Appellate Division ( 18 A D 2d 849 ). Taking no part: Judge Bergan.

Cases cited