Hyperlawhypertext legal database Reichel v. Katz 16 N.Y.2d 880

← Cases

Reichel v. Katz

16 N.Y.2d 880 Court N.Y. Decision date 1965-09-30 English

Contents

Majority

p. 880
Edith Reichel, Appellant-Respondent, v. Irving Katz et al., Respondents-Appellants, and Louis Angelo, Respondent.
Submitted September 27, 1965;
decided September 30, 1965.
p. 881
Andrew A. Gore for motion and opposed to cross motion.
William D. Hand opposed to motion and for cross motion.
Patrick L. Wynne opposed to motion and for cross motion.

Motion and cross motion granted and appeals dismissed upon the ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.