Hyperlawhypertext legal database Claim of Namanowich v. En Operating Corp. 17 N.Y.2d 642

← Cases

Claim of Namanowich v. En Operating Corp.

17 N.Y.2d 642 Court N.Y. Decision date 1966-03-24 English

Contents

Majority

p. 642
In the Matter of the Claim of Esther Namanowich, Respondent, v. En Operating Corporation et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.
Argued February 14, 1966;
decided March 24, 1966.
p. 643
Bernard F. Farley and Joseph M. Soviero for appellants.
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (Jorge L. Gomez, Ruth Kessler Toch and Daniel Polansky of counsel), for Workmen’s Compensation Board, respondent.
No appearance for claimant-respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs to respondent Workmen’s Compensation Board; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Fuld, Van Voorhis, Burke, Scileppi, Bergan and Keating.