Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta People v. Cohen 18 N.Y.2d 650

← Cases

People v. Cohen

18 N.Y.2d 650 Court N.Y. Decision date 1966-07-07 English

Judges Concur: Judges Van VooRhis, Bueke, Scileppi, Beegan and Keating. Judge Fuld dissents in the following memorandum in which Chief Judge Desmond concurs: I adhere to the views I expressed in People v. Dinan (11 N Y 2d 350, 357) — that evidence should be excluded if obtained by interception of telephone communications in contravention of the Federal Communications Act, and, accordingly, vote to reverse the order appealed from.

Contents

Majority

p. 650
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Carl I. Cohen, Appellant.
Argued June 2, 1966;
decided July 7, 1966.
p. 651
Eugene Gold for appellant.
Aaron E. Koota, District Attorney {William'I. Siegel of counsel), for respondent.

Order affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Judges Van VooRhis, Bueke, Scileppi, Beegan and Keating. Judge Fuld dissents in the following memorandum in which Chief Judge Desmond concurs: I adhere to the views I expressed in People v. Dinan ( 11 N Y 2d 350 , 357) — that evidence should be excluded if obtained by interception of telephone communications in contravention of the Federal Communications Act, and, accordingly, vote to reverse the order appealed from.

Cases cited