Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta King v. Pelkofski 18 N.Y.2d 688

← Cases

King v. Pelkofski

18 N.Y.2d 688 Court N.Y. Decision date 1966-07-07 English

Contents

Majority

p. 688
Rose King, Appellant-Respondent, v. Joseph Pelkofski, Defendant, and Genevieve Pelkofski, Respondent-Appellant, et al., Respondent.
Argued April 28, 1966;
decided July 7, 1966.
p. 689
John J. Boyle, James J. Weissman and John C. O’Malley for appellant-respondent.
Richard W. Walser and Howard J. Grace for respondent-appellant.

Appeals dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution because it directs a remission to the Trial Term to ascertain the total of various items which gives plaintiff a lien upon the real estate. Appeals may be taken directly to this court from the determination hereafter to be made by the Trial Term.