Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Claim of Fragale v. Armory Maintenance 18 N.Y.2d 729

← Cases

Claim of Fragale v. Armory Maintenance

18 N.Y.2d 729 Court N.Y. Decision date 1966-09-29 English

Judges Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Fuld, Bubke, Bebgan and Keating. Judges Van Voobhis and Scileppi dissent and vote to reverse and to dismiss the claim upon the dissenting opinion at the Appellate Division.

Contents

Majority

p. 729
In the Matter of the Claim of Mary Fragale, Respondent, v. Armory Maintenance et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.
Argued September 20, 1966;
decided September 29, 1966.
p. 730
Bernard F. Farley and Joseph M. Soviero for appellants.
Louis J. Lefkowits, Attorney-General (David Belson, Ruth Kessler Toch and Daniel Polcmsky of counsel), for Workmen’s Compensation Board, respondent.
Matthew J. Sherlock, Jr., for claimant-respondent.

Order affirmed on the opinion at the Appellate Division, with costs. (See, also, Matter of Connelly v. Samaritan Hosp., 259 N. Y. 137 ; Matter of Stern v. Electrol, Inc., 4 A D 2d 110 , mot. for lv. to app. den. 3 N Y 2d 707 .) No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Fuld, Bubke, Bebgan and Keating. Judges Van Voobhis and Scileppi dissent and vote to reverse and to dismiss the claim upon the dissenting opinion at the Appellate Division.

Cases cited