Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Sautkulis v. Conklin 2 N.Y.2d 919

← Cases

Sautkulis v. Conklin

2 N.Y.2d 919 Court N.Y. Decision date 1957-03-08 Docket Action No. 1; Action No. 2 English

Judges Concur: Conway, Ch. J., Desmond, Dye, Fuld, Froessel, Van Voorhis and Burke, JJ.

Contents

Majority

p. 919
John Sautkulis, Appellant, v. Frances Conklin et al., Respondents. William Matzok et al., Respondents, v. John Sautkulis, Appellant.
(Action No. 1.)
(Action No. 2)
(Consolidated Actions.)
Argued January 21, 1957;
decided March 8, 1957.
p. 920
Nathan Dorfman and David Quient for appellant.
Paul J. Leach for William Matzok and another, respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs to respondents Matzok; no opinion.

Concur: Conway, Ch. J., Desmond, Dye, Fuld, Froessel, Van Voorhis and Burke, JJ.