Majority
Upon further reargument: Judgment, as amended, reversed and a new trial ordered in a memorandum: Upon this reargument we adhere to our earlier determination that defendant’s confession was proven to be voluntary beyond a reasonable doubt ( 18 N Y 2d 832 ). Nevertheless, since his codefendant’s involuntary confession, which implicated him, was admitted at their joint trial, defendant Hocking should, as a matter of fair procedure, receive a new trial with defendant Burd’s confession excluded (People v. Cender, 18 N Y 2d 610 ; People v. Morgan, 17 N Y 2d 696 ; People v. Donovan, 13 N Y 2d 148 ; People v. Rodriguez, 11 N Y 2d 279 ; People v. Noble, 9 N Y 2d 571 ; People v. Waterman, 9 N Y 2d 561 ; People v. Bonino, 1 N Y 2d 752 ; People v. Rudish, 294 N. Y. 500 ).
Concur: 'Chief Judge Fued and Judges Burke, Scieeppi, Bergan, Keating and Breecel. Judge Jasen dissents and votes to affirm.
Cases cited
- People v. Burd 18 N Y 2d 832 p. 654
- People v. Cender 18 N Y 2d 610 p. 654
- People v. Morgan 17 N Y 2d 696 p. 654
- People v. Donovan 13 N Y 2d 148 p. 654
- People v. Rodriguez 11 N Y 2d 279 p. 654
- People v. Noble 9 N Y 2d 571 p. 654
- People v. Waterman 9 N Y 2d 561 p. 654
- People v. Bonino 1 N Y 2d 752 p. 654
- People v. Rudish 294 N. Y. 500 p. 654