Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Chilk v. City of New York 22 N.Y.2d 661

← Cases

Chilk v. City of New York

22 N.Y.2d 661 Court N.Y. Decision date 1968-05-15 English

Contents

Majority

p. 661
In the Matter of Valentine G. Chilk, Respondent, v. City of New York, Appellant. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent. In the Matter of Anne Eisner, Respondent, v. City of New York, Appellant. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.
Argued April 11, 1968;
decided May 15, 1968.
p. 662
J. Lee Rankin, Corporation Counsel (Robert T. Hartmann and Stanley Buchsbaum of counsel), for appellant.
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (Henriette Frieder, Ruth Kessler Toch and Daniel Polansky of counsel), for Workmen’s Compensation Board, respondent.
Lawrence N. Marcus for Administrative Board of Judicial Conference.

No appearances for claimants-respondents.

In each proceeding: Order affirmed, with costs, on the opinion at the Appellate Division in Matter of Chilk v. City of New York ( 26 A D 2d 425 ).

Concur: Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Keating, Breitel and Jasen. Taking no part: Chief Judge Fuld.

Cases cited