Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Holborow v. New York City Transit Authority 30 N.Y.2d 868

← Cases

Holborow v. New York City Transit Authority

30 N.Y.2d 868 Court N.Y. Decision date 1972-06-09 English

Contents
p. 868
In the Matter of Walter Holborow, Respondent-Appellant, v. New York City Transit Authority, Appellant-Respondent.
Argued May 30, 1972;
decided June 9, 1972.
p. 870
John A. Murray, Helen R. Cassidy and John G. de Roos for appellant-respondent.
Frank R. McGlynn for respondent-appellant.

no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi,

Bergan and Gibson.

Judges Breitel and Jasen dissent and vote to modify in the following memorandum: We dissent and vote to modify and reinstate the determination on the ground that there was substantial evidence to sustain the determination and if believed, as it was, established the unfitness in character and conduct of petitioner to remain a transit police officer, a position of extreme sensitivity.

On appeal by the petitioner: Appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the dissent at the Appellate Division is not on a stated question of law in favor of petitioner and he is not aggrieved by the modification at the Appellate Division (CPLB, 5601, subd. [a], pars, [i], [iii]).