Majority
Order affirmed, without costs. Question certified answered in the affirmative. Defendant-appellant’s arguments concerning deprivation of due process and discriminatory action are refuted by our decisions in Mount St. Mary’s Hosp. v. Catherwood ( 26 N Y 2d 493 , mot. for rearg. den. 27 N Y 2d 737 ) and People v. Ditniak ( 28 N Y 2d 74 ). Neither is there improper delegation of legislative power (Chiropractic Assn. of N. Y. v. Hilleboe, 12 N Y 2d 109 ; Matter of City of Utica v. Water Pollution Control Bd., 5 N Y 2d 164 ; Paterson v. University of State of N. Y., 14 N Y 2d 432 ). There was ample evidence at Special Term
Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Breitel, Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones and Wachtler.
Cases cited
- Mount St. Mary's Hospital v. Catherwood 26 N Y 2d 493 p. 583
- People v. Ditniak 28 N Y 2d 74 p. 583
- Chiropractic Ass'n of New York, Inc. v. Hilleboe 12 N Y 2d 109 p. 583
- City of Utica v. Water Pollution Control Board 5 N Y 2d 164 p. 583
- Paterson v. University of New York 14 N Y 2d 432 p. 583