Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Hammerl v. Maevis 34 N.Y.2d 579

← Cases

Hammerl v. Maevis

34 N.Y.2d 579 Court N.Y. Decision date 1974-03-20 English

Contents

Majority

p. 579
In the Matter of Joseph F. Hammerl, Respondent, v. Alfred C. Maevis, as Commissioner of the Department of Public Works, Appellant.
Argued February 13, 1974;
decided March 20, 1974.
p. 580
Norman Redlich, Corporation Counsel (Jesse J. Fine and Stanley Buchsbaum of counsel), for appellant.
Julius W. Cohn for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs to petitioner-respondent, on the Per Curiam opinion at the Appellate Division.

Concur: Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Wachtler and Stevens. Judges Jones and Rabin dissent and vote to reverse and reinstate the determination of the Commissioner on the dissenting opinion by Mr. Justice Louis J. Capozzoli at the Appellate Division.