Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Claim of Ronan v. Scholfield 35 N.Y.2d 788

← Cases

Claim of Ronan v. Scholfield

35 N.Y.2d 788 Court N.Y. Decision date 1974-11-15 English

Contents

Majority

p. 788
In the Matter of the Claim of James F. Ronan, Appellant, v. Ethel Scholfield et al., Respondents. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.
Submitted October 7, 1974;
decided November 15, 1974.
p. 789
James F. Roman, pro se, for motion.
Louis J. Lefhowits, Attorney-General (Daniel Polanshy of counsel), and Gennaro Taiani opposed.

Motion dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.