Hyperlawhypertext legal database Rosenblatt v. Jiudice 36 N.Y.2d 683

← Cases

Rosenblatt v. Jiudice

36 N.Y.2d 683 Court N.Y. Decision date 1975-02-14 English

Contents

Majority

p. 683
In the Matter of Albert M. Rosenblatt, as District Attorney of Dutchess County, Respondent, v. Joseph Jiudice, as Judge of the County Court of Dutchess County, Respondent. William Abruzzi, Proposed Intervenor, Appellant.
Submitted February 10, 1975;
decided February 14, 1975.
p. 684
Albert M. Rosenblatt, District Attorney, for motion.
Robert G. Morvillo opposed.

Motion granted and appeal dismissed, without costs. With' respect to the judgment,-denominated" an order, dismissing the proceeding, appellant is not an aggrieved party within the meaning of CPLB 5511; and no appeal lies from a “ decision ” or “ opinion ” as distingüished from the judgment-order in the proceeding (see CPLB 5512, subd. [a] ; People ex rel. Degbrina v. Fay, 13 N Y 2d 901 ,902).