Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Dye v. Lincoln First Bank 38 N.Y.2d 769

← Cases

Dye v. Lincoln First Bank

38 N.Y.2d 769 Court N.Y. Decision date 1975-12-04 English

Contents

Majority

p. 769
Marvin R. Dye et al., as Trustees for Bondholders Under an Instrument of Trust, Appellants, v Lincoln First Bank of Rochester, Formerly Lincoln Rochester Trust Company, et al., Respondents.
Argued October 20, 1975;
decided December 4, 1975
p. 770
Walter J. Holloran for appellants.
G. Robert Witmer, Jr., for Lincoln First Bank of Rochester, respondent.
p. 771
Bruce E. Hansen for Myron S. Lewis and others, respondents.

Memorandum. Order affirmed, with costs, on the reasons set forth in the opinion of the Appellate Division and because the prior grant of summary judgment, the "procedural equivalent of a trial” (Falk v Goodman, 7 NY2d 87 , 91), is a binding final judgment on the merits which bars a subsequent action between the same parties for the same cause of action (Eidelberg v Zellermayer, 5 AD2d 658 , 662-663, affd 6 NY2d 815 ; see, also, Klein v Gruss & Son, 18 AD2d 1085 ; Riley v Southern Transp. Co., 278 App Div 605 ; 6 Carmody-Wait, 2d, NY Practice, § 39:39, p 492).

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur in memorandum.

Order affirmed.

Cases cited