Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta City of New York v. State 39 N.Y.2d 951

← Cases

City of New York v. State

39 N.Y.2d 951 Court N.Y. Decision date 1976-07-01 Docket Claim No. 53715 English

Contents

Majority

p. 951
City of New York, Respondent, v State of New York, Appellant.
(Claim No. 53715.)
Argued June 2, 1976;
decided July 1, 1976
p. 952
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (Joseph F. Gibbons, Ruth Kessler Toch and Grace K. Banoff of counsel), for appellant.
p. 953
W. Bernard Richland, Corporation Counsel (Morris Einhorn and L. Kevin Sheridan of counsel), for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs, on the opinion by then Presiding Justice J. Clarence Herlihy at the Appellate Division ( 48 AD2d 79 ). We also note that the question of timeliness argued by the State was raised for the first time at the Appellate Division. Since this issue was not presented to the Court of Claims it has not been preserved for our review.

Concur: Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke.

Cases cited