Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Bruto v. George Herman & Associates, Inc. 47 N.Y.2d 941

← Cases

Bruto v. George Herman & Associates, Inc.

47 N.Y.2d 941 Court N.Y. Decision date 1979-06-28 English

Contents

Majority

p. 941
Joseph B. Bruto, Appellant, v George Herman and Associates, Inc., et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Respondents. William Higgins & Sons, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.
Argued June 7, 1979;
decided June 28, 1979
p. 943
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Paul William Beltz for appellant.
Richard K. Schoepperle for George Herman and Associates, Inc., defendant and third-party plaintiff-respondent.
Arthur J. Maloney for Dyna Crete Corporation, defendant and third-party plaintiff-respondent.
Herbert J. Lustig for third-party defendant-respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division ( 64 AD2d 844 ).

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Meyer. Taking no part: Judge Fuchs-berg.

Cases cited