Hyperlawhypertext legal database Shiseido Cosmetics (America) , Ltd. v. State Human Rights Appeal Board 52 N.Y.2d 916

← Cases

Shiseido Cosmetics (America) , Ltd. v. State Human Rights Appeal Board

52 N.Y.2d 916 Court N.Y. Decision date 1981-02-10 English

Contents

Majority

p. 916
In the Matter of Shiseido Cosmetics (America) , Ltd., et al., Respondents, v State Human Rights Appeal Board et al., Respondents, and Joan C. Laufer, Appellant.
Argued January 5, 1981;
decided February 10, 1981
p. 918
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Michael F. Erdheim for appellant.
Lloyd De Vos for petitioners-respondents.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, with costs. We agree, and for the reasons stated by the Appellate Division, that there is not sufficient evidence on the record considered as a whole to support the determination of the State Human Rights Appeal Board that respondent discriminated against complainant because of her national origin in violation of the Human Rights Law.

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.