Majority
p. 1019Clara Galus, Individually and as Executrix of Philip Galus, Deceased, Appellant, v William Milner, Respondent, et al., Defendant. Decided October 29, 1981
p. 1020
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Daniel H. Mahoney for appellant.
p. 1021
James M. Conboy for respondent.
OPINION OF THE COURT
On summary consideration, order affirmed, with costs. We cannot say that the order reinstating the jury’s verdict was an abuse of discretion as a matter of law (Holland v Blake, 31 NY2d 734 ).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.
Cases cited
- Holland v. Blake 31 NY2d 734 p. 1021