Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Mickel v. State 54 N.Y.2d 858

← Cases

Mickel v. State

54 N.Y.2d 858 Court N.Y. Decision date 1981-10-13 Docket Claim No. 60670 English

Contents

Majority

p. 858
Emma A. Mickel, Appellant, v State of New York et al., Respondents.
(Claim No. 60670.)
Argued September 3, 1981;
decided October 13, 1981
p. 859
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Dennis H. Cleary for appellant.
p. 860
Robert Abrams, Attorney-General (Stanley Fishman and Shirley Adelson Siegel of counsel), for respondents.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum opinion of that court ( 77 AD2d 794 ). We note that claimant’s application for permission to file a late claim stating a cause of action for trespass arising out of the same transactions was denied. The issues presented on that application were not before the Appellate Division and are not now before us, and appellant now presses only a claim grounded in the theory of de facto appropriation. Accordingly, we do not reach the trespass issues.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Cases cited