Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Tripoli v. Tripoli 56 N.Y.2d 684

← Cases

Tripoli v. Tripoli

56 N.Y.2d 684 Court N.Y. Decision date 1982-05-06 English

Contents

Majority

p. 684
Joseph R. Tripoli, Individually and as a Shareholder of Onondaga Landfill Systems, Inc., et al., Respondents, v Dominic Tripoli et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant. Dominic Tripoli, Individually and on Behalf of Onondaga Landfill Systems, Inc., Appellant, v Joseph R. Tripoli et al., Respondents.
Argued March 29, 1982;
decided May 6, 1982
p. 685
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Richard W. Cook for appellants.
J. Eric Charlton for respondents.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs. The propriety of the Appellate Division’s holding that it was error to have set aside the verdict as against the weight of the evidence is beyond the scope of this court’s power of review (Rochester Tel. Corp. v Green Is. Constr. Corp., 51 NY2d 788 ; Gutin v Mascali & Sons, 11 NY2d 97 , 99; Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals, § 148, p 588).

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Cases cited