Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Peninsula National Bank v. Joseph M. Turecamo, Inc. 56 N.Y.2d 794

← Cases

Peninsula National Bank v. Joseph M. Turecamo, Inc.

56 N.Y.2d 794 Court N.Y. Decision date 1982-05-20 English

Contents

Majority

p. 794
Peninsula National Bank, Respondent, v Joseph M. Turecamo, Inc., Appellant.
Decided May 20, 1982
p. 795
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
James E. Frankel for appellant.
Harold N. Schwinger for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [b]), order affirmed, with costs. Respondent’s claims with respect to the arbitrator’s refusal to grant an adjournment and his refusal to accept certain evidence raise no cognizable objection to the arbitration award, given our narrow scope of review (CPLR 7511, subd [b], par 1, cl [i]).

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.