Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Gould v. Kerwick 57 N.Y.2d 1012

← Cases

Gould v. Kerwick

57 N.Y.2d 1012 Court N.Y. Decision date 1982-11-11 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1012
In the Matter of Kingdon Gould, Jr., et al., Respondents, v Robert A. Kerwick, as Assessor of the Town of Hardenburgh, et al., Appellants.
Decided November 11, 1982
p. 1015
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Stephen L. Oppenheim for appellants.
G. Gordon Coughlin, Jr., for respondents.

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]),

p. 1016
order reversed, with costs, and the judgment and order of Supreme Court, Ulster County, reinstated for reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum of Justice Howard A. Levine at the Appellate Division ( 87 AD2d 917 , 919-920). Question certified answered in the affirmative.

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.

Cases cited