Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Connell v. Ellison 58 N.Y.2d 869

← Cases

Connell v. Ellison

58 N.Y.2d 869 Court N.Y. Decision date 1983-02-10 English

Contents

Majority

p. 869
Martin T. Connell, Appellant, v Robert Ellison et al, Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Respondents, and Hilbert F. La Pierre, Third-Party Defendant and Fourth-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. Mildred M. MacIntyre, Fourth-Party Defendant-Respondent.
Argued January 6, 1983;
decided February 10, 1983
p. 871
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Charles A. Gardner for appellant.
Case, Leader & Ayling for Robert Ellison and another, defendants-respondents.
Sanders D. Heller for Hilbert F. La Pierre, third-party defendant-respondent.
Mahlon T. Clements for Mildred M. MacIntyre, fourth-party defendant-respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division ( 86 AD2d 943 ). This disposition is without prejudice to either party, if so

p. 872
advised, making application to the trial court to obtain a definition of boundaries of the subject premises.

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg, Meyer and Simons.

Cases cited